AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3: 3.3V LDO Regulator Comparison


AMS1117-3.3 and LM1117-3.3 are widely used 3.3V linear voltage regulators for embedded electronics, development boards, industrial control systems, communication equipment, and other power management applications.

Both belong to the popular 1117 family of low-dropout regulators and are commonly considered when designing a 3.3V power rail. However, the similarity in their part numbers does not mean that every electrical specification is identical.

For engineers comparing AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3, the important factors include output voltage, load current, dropout voltage, input voltage, package, thermal performance, output capacitor requirements, and the exact manufacturer part number.


AMS1117-3.3.png

What Is AMS1117-3.3?

AMS1117-3.3 is a fixed-output 3.3V LDO regulator designed to convert a higher input voltage into a regulated 3.3V supply.

It is widely used in circuits where a simple linear regulator is required for powering microcontrollers, sensors, communication modules, memory devices, and other low-voltage electronics.

The 3.3V output version is particularly common because 3.3V is widely used by modern digital ICs and embedded processors.

Typical applications include:

Microcontroller boards

FPGA systems

IoT devices

Sensor modules

Communication circuits

Industrial controllers

Embedded electronic equipment

What Is LM1117-3.3?

LM1117-3.3 is the fixed 3.3V version of Texas Instruments' LM1117 low-dropout linear regulator family.

TI specifies the LM1117 as an 800mA, 15V linear voltage regulator. The family includes fixed 1.8V, 2.5V, 3.3V and 5V versions as well as an adjustable version.

For example, TI's LM1117-3.3 ordering variants are available in packages such as TO-220 and TO-252, while other package options are also available within the family.

The device includes current limiting and thermal shutdown, making it suitable for general-purpose power regulation applications.


LM1117-3.3.png

AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3 Output Voltage

The main purpose of both devices in this comparison is to provide a regulated 3.3V output.

A 3.3V LDO can be used to supply:

MCUs

FPGAs

EEPROMs

Sensors

Wireless modules

Logic circuits

Display controllers

Peripheral ICs

The actual output-voltage accuracy depends on the exact device and operating conditions.

For LM1117-3.3, TI specifies a nominal 3.3V output. Its datasheet gives a 3.267V to 3.333V range under the specified test condition at 25°C, while the broader electrical characteristics specify the relevant limits across operating conditions.

For AMS1117-3.3, engineers should use the datasheet for the exact manufacturer and ordering code because specifications can vary among different 1117 implementations.

Output Current

Output current is an important factor when selecting an LDO.

TI specifies the LM1117 family for up to 800mA of output current.

This makes LM1117-3.3 suitable for many embedded boards and moderate-current 3.3V power rails.

For AMS1117-3.3, the commonly published device specifications also position the device in the approximately 1A-class 1117 regulator category, but engineers should not assume that every AMS1117-branded device provides identical current capability.

The actual load requirement should always be compared with the maximum rated output current, thermal conditions, input voltage, and package.

Dropout Voltage

Dropout voltage is one of the most important specifications for an LDO.

It determines how close the input voltage can approach the required output voltage before regulation is lost.

TI specifies a typical LM1117 dropout voltage of approximately 1.2V at 800mA.

This means that an LM1117-3.3 generally requires substantially more than 3.3V at its input when operating near its maximum load.

For example, when designing a 3.3V rail, engineers should not assume that a 3.5V input will always be sufficient at high current.

The actual dropout voltage varies with output current and operating conditions, so the relevant datasheet curves should be reviewed during power-supply design.

Input Voltage Requirements

The input voltage must be high enough to maintain the required 3.3V output while remaining within the regulator's maximum input rating.

TI specifies the LM1117 family with a maximum input voltage of 15V and a minimum input voltage of 2.6V at the product level, with the actual fixed-output operating conditions depending on the selected version.

For an LM1117-3.3 circuit, the input voltage must therefore be selected with both dropout voltage and maximum input voltage in mind.

A higher input voltage can increase power dissipation because the regulator converts the voltage difference into heat.

Power Dissipation and Thermal Design

Linear regulators dissipate excess voltage as heat.

The approximate power dissipation can be understood as:

P ≈ (VIN − VOUT) × IOUT

For a 5V input, 3.3V output and 500mA load, for example, the regulator must dissipate approximately 0.85W.

This can become significant for small PCB packages.

For this reason, engineers comparing AMS1117-3.3 and LM1117-3.3 should consider:

Input voltage

Output voltage

Load current

Package

PCB copper area

Ambient temperature

Thermal resistance

Maximum junction temperature

A regulator that meets the electrical current specification may still require additional thermal consideration in the actual product.

LM1117-3.3 Package Options

The LM1117 family is available in several packages.

TI lists options including:

SOT-223

TO-220

TO-252

TO-263

WSON


This provides flexibility when selecting the regulator for different PCB designs.

The package is particularly important when replacing an existing 1117 regulator because the same output voltage does not guarantee physical compatibility.

Engineers should compare:

Package dimensions

Pin numbering

Pin functions

PCB footprint

Thermal pad requirements

Copper area

Before replacing the component, the complete ordering code should be identified.

AMS1117-3.3 Package Considerations

AMS1117-3.3 devices are commonly found in SOT-223 packages and other 1117-style package configurations.

However, different manufacturers may use different package options and markings.

For an existing PCB, engineers should never select a replacement only by searching for "1117 3.3V."

The complete part number should be compared with the original device to confirm:

Input pin

Ground pin

Output pin

Package dimensions

Tab function

Thermal characteristics

This is especially important for SOT-223-based designs.

Output Capacitor Requirements

The output capacitor is important for LDO stability and transient response.

TI specifies a minimum 10µF load capacitance for LM1117 and notes that a 10µF tantalum capacitor is required at the output to improve transient response and stability.

When evaluating AMS1117-3.3 as an LM1117-3.3 alternative, engineers should check the capacitor requirements in the exact AMS1117 datasheet.

The capacitor's capacitance, ESR, voltage rating, temperature characteristics, and PCB placement can all influence regulator performance.

Current Limiting and Thermal Protection

The LM1117 includes current limiting and thermal shutdown functions.

These protections help prevent damage when the regulator experiences excessive current or temperature.

The exact protection behavior varies by device family and manufacturer, so AMS1117-3.3 and LM1117-3.3 should be evaluated using their respective specifications rather than assuming that all 1117 devices provide identical protection thresholds.

AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3 Applications

Both types of 3.3V LDO can be used in a wide range of electronic designs.

Microcontroller Systems

A 3.3V LDO can provide power to microcontrollers and their peripheral circuits.

Applications include:

STM32 systems

ARM microcontroller boards

IoT controllers

Industrial control boards

Embedded systems

FPGA and Digital Logic

3.3V rails are commonly required by FPGA I/O banks and supporting digital logic.

An LDO can be used to generate a regulated rail from a higher input voltage when the current and thermal requirements are suitable.

Sensor and Communication Modules

Many sensors, wireless modules and interface ICs operate from 3.3V.

A 1117 regulator can provide a simple power source for these circuits when efficiency requirements are not particularly demanding.

Development Boards

1117-family regulators are frequently found on development boards because they provide a simple and inexpensive method of generating a 3.3V supply.

Can AMS1117-3.3 Replace LM1117-3.3?

In many applications, AMS1117-3.3 can be evaluated as an alternative to LM1117-3.3 because both are 3.3V members of the 1117 LDO regulator family.

However, engineers should not treat them as automatically identical.

Before replacement, compare:

Output voltage

Maximum output current

Dropout voltage

Input voltage range

Output capacitor requirements

Load regulation

Line regulation

Quiescent current

Thermal protection

Current limiting

Package

Pinout

Operating temperature

The exact manufacturer's datasheet should be used for the final replacement decision.

Can LM1117-3.3 Replace AMS1117-3.3?

The same evaluation process applies in the opposite direction.

LM1117-3.3 may be suitable for a circuit currently using AMS1117-3.3 if its electrical and thermal specifications meet the system requirements.

However, engineers should pay particular attention to the regulator's dropout voltage.

If the original circuit has a small difference between input and output voltage, a regulator with a higher dropout voltage may fail to maintain the required 3.3V output at higher load currents.

Package compatibility must also be confirmed before making a PCB-level replacement.

AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3 for 5V to 3.3V Conversion

One common application is converting a 5V rail to 3.3V.

Both AMS1117-3.3 and LM1117-3.3 can be evaluated for this type of application.

However, thermal performance becomes important when the load current increases.

For example, at 5V input and 3.3V output, the voltage difference is 1.7V.

At 800mA, this represents approximately 1.36W of power dissipation.

The PCB and regulator package therefore need to be capable of removing the generated heat.

For lower-current applications, the thermal requirements are less demanding.

AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3 for Embedded Designs

For an embedded system using a conventional 5V input and a moderate 3.3V load, either regulator family may be worth evaluating.

However, the final selection should consider the complete power architecture.

A switching regulator may be more appropriate when:

Input voltage is much higher than 3.3V

Output current is high

Battery life is important

Power efficiency is critical

Thermal dissipation is limited

An LDO remains attractive when the circuit requires a simple, low-cost power rail and the voltage drop and current requirements are acceptable.

LM1117-3.3 as an Alternative to Older 1117 Designs

The LM1117 family remains widely used and is available in multiple fixed-output and adjustable versions.

TI also identifies the TLV1117 as a newer drop-in alternative to LM1117.

This is relevant for engineers designing new products or reviewing an existing 1117-based power supply.

Instead of comparing only AMS1117-3.3 and LM1117-3.3, designers may also evaluate newer LDO families when lower power consumption, improved efficiency, or different package requirements are important.

AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3 Replacement Checklist

Before replacing one 3.3V 1117 regulator with another, engineers should verify:

Input voltage

3.3V output accuracy

Maximum load current

Dropout voltage

Line regulation

Load regulation

Quiescent current

Output capacitor

Input capacitor

Thermal resistance

Operating temperature

Current limiting

Thermal shutdown

Package

Pin assignment

PCB footprint

These checks help determine whether the proposed device can operate reliably in the existing circuit.

AMS1117-3.3 vs LM1117-3.3: Key Considerations

AMS1117-3.3 and LM1117-3.3 share the same basic purpose: generating a regulated 3.3V supply using a linear regulator.

LM1117 is an established 800mA LDO family with fixed 3.3V versions, multiple packages, current limiting, thermal shutdown, and a typical 1.2V dropout specification at 800mA.

AMS1117-3.3 can be considered for similar general-purpose 3.3V regulation applications, but the exact manufacturer's specifications should always be checked before substitution.

For a production design, the correct approach is to compare the complete part numbers and evaluate electrical, thermal, mechanical, and PCB requirements rather than assuming that all 1117 regulators are interchangeable.


Related Articles

Explore related electronics articles and guides.

Sep 27, 2026

LM358 vs LM324: What Is the Difference Between Dual and Quad Op Amps?

Compare LM358 and LM324 operational amplifiers by channel count, package, pinout, performance, and circuit applications to select the right part.

Sep 27, 2026

LM7805 vs LM317: Which Linear Voltage Regulator Should You Use?

Compare LM7805 and LM317 linear voltage regulators by output voltage, pinout, external components, heat dissipation, and applications.

Sep 27, 2026

1N4007 vs 1N5408: What Is the Difference?

Compare 1N4007 and 1N5408 rectifier diodes by current rating, voltage rating, package size, and applications to choose the right part for your design.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7A200T-2FBG484I Upgrade From XC7A100T-2FGG484C

Learn why engineers upgrade from XC7A100T-2FGG484C to XC7A200T-2FBG484I and what to consider for FPGA resource expansion and system migration.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7A100T-2CSG324I vs XC7A100T-2FGG484C FPGA Package Difference

Compare XC7A100T-2CSG324I and XC7A100T-2FGG484C package options and understand their impact on Artix-7 FPGA design, I/O planning and industrial applications.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7Z020-1CLG484I vs XC7Z020-2CLG484I Speed Grade Difference

Compare XC7Z020-1CLG484I and XC7Z020-2CLG484I speed grades and understand how performance differences affect Zynq-7000 embedded system design.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7Z020-1CLG400I vs XC7Z020-1CLG484I Package Selection

Understand the differences between XC7Z020-1CLG400I and XC7Z020-1CLG484I and how package selection affects Zynq-7000 embedded system design.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7Z020-1CLG400I vs XC7Z020-1CLG484I Package Difference

Compare XC7Z020-1CLG400I and XC7Z020-1CLG484I package differences, I/O requirements and design considerations for Zynq-7000 embedded systems.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7A35T-1CSG324C vs XC7A50T-2CPG236I FPGA

Compare XC7A35T-1CSG324C and XC7A50T-2CPG236I Artix-7 FPGA devices for industrial control, embedded applications and programmable logic designs.

Aug 23, 2026

Why Engineers Upgrade from XC6SLX45-2CSG324I to XC7A100T-1FGG484C for New FPGA Designs

Explore the differences between XC6SLX45-2CSG324I and XC7A100T-1FGG484C and understand why many FPGA designs migrate from Spartan-6 to Artix-7 platforms.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7Z020-1CLG484I vs XC7Z020-2CLG484I Speed Grade Difference and Zynq-7000 FPGA Selection Guide

Compare XC7Z020-1CLG484I and XC7Z020-2CLG484I Zynq-7000 SoC devices including speed grade differences, embedded applications and FPGA design considerations.

Aug 23, 2026

XC7A100T-2FGG484C vs XC7A200T-2FBG484I FPGA Upgrade Comparison for High Performance Designs

Compare XC7A100T-2FGG484C and XC7A200T-2FBG484I Artix-7 FPGA devices for industrial control, image processing, communication and hardware acceleration applicati...

WhatsApp Telegram LINE Email