ADS1115 and ADS1015 are precision analog-to-digital converters from Texas Instruments designed for applications that need to convert analog signals into digital data through an I2C interface.
Both devices belong to the same ADC family and provide four input channels, a programmable gain amplifier, a comparator, and an I2C interface. Because their basic architecture is similar, ADS1115 vs ADS1015 is a common comparison when engineers select an ADC for sensors, measurement equipment, embedded systems, and data acquisition designs.
The biggest difference is resolution. ADS1115 provides 16-bit resolution, while ADS1015 provides 12-bit resolution. However, resolution is not the only factor engineers should consider. Sampling rate, input range, noise performance, power consumption, and application requirements can also influence the choice.
ADS1115 is a 16-bit precision ADC designed for applications requiring higher-resolution analog measurement.
The device provides four single-ended input channels or two differential input channels. An integrated programmable gain amplifier allows the input range to be adjusted for different signal levels.
ADS1115 communicates with a microcontroller through an I2C-compatible interface.
Typical applications include:
Sensor measurement
Battery monitoring
Industrial instrumentation
Temperature measurement
Pressure measurement
Data acquisition
Portable measurement equipment
Embedded control systems
Its 16-bit resolution makes ADS1115 particularly useful when the input signal contains relatively small voltage changes that need to be distinguished digitally.
ADS1015 is a 12-bit precision ADC with a similar architecture to ADS1115.
It provides four single-ended inputs or two differential inputs and includes an integrated programmable gain amplifier.
Like ADS1115, ADS1015 uses an I2C interface, allowing it to connect to common microcontrollers and embedded processors.
Sensor interfaces
Industrial control
Portable instruments
Embedded measurement
Analog monitoring
The lower resolution can be sufficient for applications where 12-bit measurement accuracy meets the system requirements.
ADS1115 and ADS1015 share many important characteristics.
Both devices provide:
I2C interface
Four input channels
Differential input capability
Programmable gain amplifier
Internal voltage reference
Comparator
Single-ended measurement
Differential measurement
Low-power operating modes
These similarities make the two ADCs useful for many of the same types of applications.
The main selection question is usually whether the application benefits from ADS1115's higher resolution or whether ADS1015 provides sufficient performance at a lower resolution.
Resolution is the most obvious difference between the two devices.
ADS1115 provides 16-bit resolution.
ADS1015 provides 12-bit resolution.
A higher resolution means that the ADC can represent an analog input using more digital levels.
For an ideal ADC:
A 12-bit converter provides 4,096 possible codes.
A 16-bit converter provides 65,536 possible codes.
This does not mean that ADS1115 will automatically provide 16 times better real-world measurement accuracy.
Actual performance also depends on:
Noise
Reference accuracy
Input signal quality
PCB layout
Gain setting
Temperature
ADC linearity
Sensor accuracy
Therefore, resolution should be considered together with the complete measurement system.
Sampling rate is another important difference.
ADS1015 is designed for faster conversion rates than ADS1115.
ADS1015 supports data rates up to 3.3kSPS, while ADS1115 supports data rates up to 860SPS.
This creates an important trade-off.
ADS1115 prioritizes higher resolution.
ADS1015 provides lower resolution but can acquire data more quickly.
For slowly changing sensor signals, ADS1115's lower maximum sampling rate may not be a problem.
For applications that require faster sampling, ADS1015 may be more suitable.
Both ADCs include a programmable gain amplifier.
The PGA allows engineers to configure the full-scale input range according to the signal being measured.
This is useful when measuring small analog signals.
For example, a sensor may produce a signal that occupies only a small portion of the ADC's supply range.
Using an appropriate gain setting can allow the ADC to use more of its available measurement range.
The gain setting should be selected carefully to ensure that the input signal does not exceed the selected full-scale range.
Both devices provide four analog input channels.
They can be configured for:
Four single-ended measurements
Two differential measurements
Differential measurement is particularly useful when measuring low-level signals where the voltage difference between two inputs is more important than the absolute voltage of either input.
This can help reduce the influence of common-mode signals in appropriate measurement configurations.
Both ADS1115 and ADS1015 communicate using an I2C-compatible serial interface.
This makes them easy to connect to microcontrollers that already provide I2C hardware.
Common host processors include:
STM32
ESP32
Arduino-compatible MCUs
AVR
PIC
Raspberry Pi
Other embedded processors
The I2C interface reduces the number of MCU pins required compared with a parallel ADC.
The devices also support multiple I2C addresses, allowing multiple ADCs to share the same I2C bus within the supported addressing architecture.
Both devices are designed for low-voltage embedded systems and operate from a supply voltage in the approximately 2V to 5.5V range.
This makes them suitable for systems based around common 3.3V and 5V power rails.
However, engineers should distinguish between:
ADC supply voltage
Analog input voltage
I2C logic levels
PGA full-scale range
The input signal must remain within the permitted electrical limits of the device.
The programmable gain amplifier determines the ADC's selectable full-scale input ranges.
This is especially important when measuring low-level analog signals.
For example, a sensor output may be only a few hundred millivolts.
Using a suitable PGA setting can provide better use of the ADC's available resolution.
However, the selected full-scale range is not the same as the maximum absolute voltage that can safely be applied to the input pins.
Engineers must also consider the common-mode and absolute input limitations specified for the device.
Both ADCs can operate in single-shot or continuous-conversion modes.
Single-shot conversion is useful when the MCU does not need continuous measurement.
The ADC can remain in a low-power state and perform a conversion when requested.
Continuous conversion is more appropriate when the system needs repeated measurements at a regular rate.
This makes both devices flexible for battery-powered and continuously monitored systems.
Power consumption is important in portable and battery-powered equipment.
Both ADCs support low-power operating modes and can be placed into a power-saving state when a conversion is not required.
The actual system power consumption depends on:
Conversion rate
Operating mode
Supply voltage
PGA configuration
I2C activity
Number of measurements
For battery-powered sensors, single-shot operation can be useful because the ADC does not need to remain continuously active.
Both devices include an integrated comparator function.
The comparator can be configured to monitor the ADC conversion result and provide an alert when the measured value crosses a programmed threshold.
This can reduce the need for a separate comparator IC in some applications.
Potential uses include:
Overvoltage detection
Threshold alarms
Sensor limits
System fault detection
Industrial monitoring
The exact comparator configuration should be selected according to the application's response requirements.
Higher ADC resolution does not automatically guarantee higher system accuracy.
ADS1115's 16-bit architecture provides more digital codes than ADS1015, but real-world accuracy is influenced by many other parameters.
Engineers should consider:
Offset error
Gain error
Integral nonlinearity
Reference stability
Temperature drift
Input source impedance
For precision measurement systems, these parameters can be more important than the nominal bit count alone.
Noise is particularly important when measuring small analog signals.
ADS1115 is often selected for applications where higher resolution and lower-level measurement are important.
However, the actual noise level depends on the selected data rate and gain configuration.
Reducing the sampling rate can improve effective measurement quality in some applications because the ADC's digital filtering and conversion characteristics can provide better noise performance.
ADS1015 may be preferable when faster acquisition is more important than maximum resolution.
Both devices can be used with analog temperature sensors.
For applications where the sensor output changes slowly, the higher resolution of ADS1115 can be useful.
For less demanding temperature monitoring, ADS1015 may provide sufficient resolution while offering faster conversion.
The best choice depends on the sensor output range and required temperature resolution.
For example, a system designed to detect small temperature changes may benefit from the additional resolution of ADS1115.
Pressure sensors often generate relatively small analog signals.
In such applications, PGA configuration becomes particularly important.
ADS1115 can be attractive when the system requires finer digital representation of a low-level pressure signal.
ADS1015 can be appropriate when the pressure measurement does not require the additional resolution and faster sampling is more important.
The sensor's output range should be compared with the selected ADC full-scale range before finalizing the design.
Both ADCs can be used for battery voltage measurement.
A resistor divider can scale the battery voltage into the ADC's acceptable input range.
ADS1115 can provide additional resolution when monitoring relatively small changes in battery voltage.
However, the resistor divider itself introduces errors, and the ADC's input limitations must be respected.
For battery monitoring systems, engineers should also consider:
Resistor tolerance
Divider current
ADC input impedance
Sampling frequency
Battery voltage range
Power consumption
Calibration requirements
Industrial equipment often requires analog monitoring of:
Pressure
Current
Voltage
Position
Flow
Sensors
Both ADCs can be used for these applications when their electrical specifications meet the system requirements.
ADS1115 may be preferable when higher resolution is important.
ADS1015 may be preferable when faster conversion is more important and 12-bit resolution is sufficient.
Industrial designs should also consider external protection and signal conditioning because the ADC input pins may require protection from electrical transients.
Both ADCs are commonly used with Arduino-compatible systems.
The I2C interface makes the connection relatively simple.
A typical system includes:
Arduino
I2C SDA
I2C SCL
ADS1115 or ADS1015
Analog sensor
The ADC handles analog conversion while the microcontroller reads the digital results through I2C.
ADS1115 is often chosen when the project requires more resolution than the MCU's internal ADC can provide.
ADS1015 can be useful when faster conversion is more important.
ESP32-based systems can also use either ADC through I2C.
An external precision ADC can be useful when the application requires measurement characteristics that are difficult to achieve with the MCU's internal ADC alone.
Potential applications include:
Environmental sensors
Industrial sensors
Analog control systems
Portable measurement devices
Data logging
ADS1115's higher resolution can be useful for precision sensor applications, while ADS1015 can provide faster conversion.
STM32 microcontrollers commonly provide multiple ADC channels, but an external ADC may still be useful when higher resolution, differential inputs, or a specific analog interface is required.
ADS1115 and ADS1015 can connect to STM32 devices through I2C.
The external ADC handles the analog conversion while the STM32 processes the resulting digital data.
This architecture can simplify sensor-interface designs where the required ADC characteristics are different from the MCU's integrated ADC.
ADS1115 and ADS1015 are available in compact packages suitable for embedded electronics.
Package selection matters for:
PCB size
Assembly process
Thermal characteristics
Manual prototyping
Production manufacturing
When replacing one device with the other, the exact package suffix must be checked.
A package change can require a new PCB footprint even if the electrical function is similar.
ADS1015 can be considered an alternative to ADS1115 when 12-bit resolution is sufficient and the application benefits from faster conversion.
However, it should not be treated as a direct equivalent in applications where the additional resolution of ADS1115 is required.
Before using ADS1015 as an alternative, engineers should evaluate:
Resolution
Sampling rate
Input range
Accuracy
Package
I2C address
Software configuration
If 12-bit resolution satisfies the system requirements, ADS1015 can be a practical alternative.
ADS1115 can be considered when an existing ADS1015 application needs higher resolution.
However, the lower maximum sampling rate of ADS1115 may become a limitation in applications that depend on faster data acquisition.
Therefore, replacing ADS1015 with ADS1115 requires checking both the measurement resolution and required sampling frequency.
For slow-moving signals, the additional resolution may provide a useful advantage.
For fast-changing signals, ADS1015 may remain the better choice.
Because both devices belong to the same ADC family and use an I2C interface, software development concepts are similar.
However, software should still be reviewed when changing devices.
Important configuration parameters include:
Device address
Input multiplexer
PGA setting
Data rate
Conversion mode
Comparator configuration
Register settings
The driver should be tested with the exact device used in production.
An application that works correctly with ADS1115 should not automatically be assumed to have identical timing or conversion characteristics with ADS1015.
When evaluating an ADS1115 replacement or ADS1015 alternative, engineers should compare the complete electrical characteristics rather than focusing only on resolution.
Important parameters include:
ADC resolution
Input channels
Differential inputs
PGA range
Input voltage limits
Operating temperature
Comparator functions
These parameters determine whether a replacement will work correctly in the target application.
Choose ADS1115 when the application prioritizes higher resolution and precision analog measurement.
Choose ADS1015 when 12-bit resolution is sufficient and a faster sampling rate is more important.
ADS1115 is well suited to relatively slow-changing signals where measurement resolution matters.
ADS1015 is useful when the system needs faster acquisition and does not require 16-bit resolution.
Neither device is universally better. The correct choice depends on the signal characteristics and system requirements.
The most important difference between ADS1115 and ADS1015 is ADC resolution.
ADS1115 provides 16-bit conversion, while ADS1015 provides 12-bit conversion.
ADS1015 also supports a higher maximum data rate, reaching up to 3.3kSPS, while ADS1115 supports data rates up to 860SPS.
Both devices provide four input channels, differential measurement capability, programmable gain, I2C communication, and integrated comparator functions.
This makes the choice relatively straightforward for many designs:
ADS1115: higher resolution and precision measurement.
ADS1015: faster sampling with lower resolution.
ADS1115 and ADS1015 are closely related precision ADCs that can serve many of the same applications.
For engineers searching for ADS1115 vs ADS1015, ADS1115 replacement, ADS1015 replacement, or ADS1115 alternative, the key question is whether the application needs 16-bit resolution or can operate effectively with 12-bit conversion.
ADS1115 is a strong choice for precision sensor measurement, battery monitoring, instrumentation, and other applications where small voltage differences need to be resolved.
ADS1015 can be a better fit for applications that need faster sampling while 12-bit resolution is sufficient.
Before production, engineers should verify the exact device revision, package, input range, data rate, noise characteristics, and software configuration to ensure the selected ADC meets the complete system requirements.
CH340G vs CH340C: USB to Serial Converter Comparison
FT232RL vs CH340G: USB to UART Converter Comparison
Explore related electronics articles and guides.
Compare LM358 and LM324 operational amplifiers by channel count, package, pinout, performance, and circuit applications to select the right part.
Compare LM7805 and LM317 linear voltage regulators by output voltage, pinout, external components, heat dissipation, and applications.
Compare 1N4007 and 1N5408 rectifier diodes by current rating, voltage rating, package size, and applications to choose the right part for your design.
Learn why engineers upgrade from XC7A100T-2FGG484C to XC7A200T-2FBG484I and what to consider for FPGA resource expansion and system migration.
Compare XC7A100T-2CSG324I and XC7A100T-2FGG484C package options and understand their impact on Artix-7 FPGA design, I/O planning and industrial applications.
Compare XC7Z020-1CLG484I and XC7Z020-2CLG484I speed grades and understand how performance differences affect Zynq-7000 embedded system design.
Understand the differences between XC7Z020-1CLG400I and XC7Z020-1CLG484I and how package selection affects Zynq-7000 embedded system design.
Compare XC7Z020-1CLG400I and XC7Z020-1CLG484I package differences, I/O requirements and design considerations for Zynq-7000 embedded systems.
Compare XC7A35T-1CSG324C and XC7A50T-2CPG236I Artix-7 FPGA devices for industrial control, embedded applications and programmable logic designs.
Explore the differences between XC6SLX45-2CSG324I and XC7A100T-1FGG484C and understand why many FPGA designs migrate from Spartan-6 to Artix-7 platforms.
Compare XC7Z020-1CLG484I and XC7Z020-2CLG484I Zynq-7000 SoC devices including speed grade differences, embedded applications and FPGA design considerations.
Compare XC7A100T-2FGG484C and XC7A200T-2FBG484I Artix-7 FPGA devices for industrial control, image processing, communication and hardware acceleration applicati...
Copyright © ElecSuppliers.com. All Rights Reserved.